My thoughts are my own. It may be interesting for you or it may not interest you at all. In any case, please provide your comments.
Monday, December 31, 2007
Serious and honest soul searching is required
unstable Pakistan
well done Aamir
Thursday, December 20, 2007
new education trend -- more business less values and education
I started sending my daughter to play school in June 2007. School was reputed and they had good (not extra ordinary) facilities. The fee I was told to pay was INR 23,000 per anum. I felt bit uneasy but then I had no other option because most of the (so called) good schools had their fee in same range. The same school has recently announced the admission for next year (June 2008) batches and last week when I went to school to pick my daughter I was shocked to see on notice board that they have revised their fee from next year. Now parents need to pay INR 33,000 per anum for Play Group, nursery and KG. The fee was hiked more than 40%. I thought to change school for my daughter next year onward but then bouncer came that all of the schools (of same level and facilities) have revised their fee to INR 33,000 per anum. Means it was a collective decision and they may have some association to decide these things. I felt education is now purely a (fast growing) business in India.
At home I sat and did some calculation. Took out the school calendar and found that school only operates for around 200 days per year. Playgroup has just 2 hours timing so you will now pay INR 33,000/400 per hour and that comes INR 82.5 per hour. I completed my Bachelor of Technology from a reputed institute. I was there for 4 years and we had hectic schedule for classes. I paid around INR 9,000 for four years. This is 9 year back story. I am not sure how much my Alma meter charges now for four year B Tech courses. Even if they charge in tune of INR 50,000 per year, that is justified because that includes rich library and book bank setup with lots of lab instruments(hardware and software) and 7 hour per day classes. The school where my daughter goes just has PlayGroup to KG. It is running in a 2 flats setup in Aundh. They have limited set of kids playing facilities. They have around 6 teachers and 4 admin staff. They have some maids (around 8). They have around 50 students. Thus cumulative sum of fee is INR 1150000 per anum. For 3 hour school they won’t be paying a high some to their school staffs. I feel the management makes good some of money. This was all about the initial stage of education. Now I will let you know another story. Someone told me this story. Few months back, one of his college friends (in US) contacted him on chat and requested him to go in person to one of the reputed engineering institute in his city for collecting the admission forms (paid seat) for his sister who was not from that place. He told that he had visited the website of institute and the last date is in next week and it seems the paid seat fee is just around INR 1, 00000 and he can bear the expense. When that person went to institute and enquired, he came to know that for getting a paid seat admission, the candidate needs to pay extra INR 3,00000 (under the table) to the institute management apart from the usual fee (specified on the website and forms).
In India, education is converting rapidly as an industry. Institute has goals to create more profit (sometime white and sometime black) than to provide quality education and create role models for society. Most confusing part is that government is not giving any attention towards this. It is just interested in providing reservations in government/private institutes and taking back the autonomies of some institutes and universities. Government schools at different levels are dying. Either there is no teacher or if the teachers are there they don’t get salaries properly or they are not good enough.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
A VIP cricketer and a (by default VIP) politician
While coming back, at Delhi airport, the GoIndiGo flight was late and my 3 year old daughter had lost her patience and started creating problems for me and my wife. We were waiting and then a long queue got formed to board the flight where a final security check was getting done. The queue was moving too slow and my daughter's was almost uncontrollable. All the passengers were getting frustrated and somehow they were waiting for their turn. All of the sudden we observed one airline official with one CISF personnel came with *someone* and bypassed the queue to board the flight. The gentleman was again a VIP. He was a MP from Maharashtra. I started feeling so bad and angry for the entire system. The passengers with small kids and family are suffering but Mr. VIP doesn’t have any problem in taking privilege of his status although he also knew that he has to fly in same plane so boarding first doesn’t make any difference.
I do know that all cricketers might not be like Mr. Gavaskar and also all politicians might not be like Mr. VIP but at least that day I felt like politicians are the most morally uncultured class in this country.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Remembring Sunil Joshi....
This One Day series can see the demise of a talented pacer like S Sreesanth. He unnecessarily got himself involved in all useless controversies which affected his state of mind and that negative effect was seen in his bowling. He could never concentrate. Actually Australian team was successful in getting this bowler disturbed himself his rhythm and they did that in a much planned way. I remember an article written by Ponting in TOI during the final phase of 20-20 world cup even before the Australian arrived to India for the One Day cricket series. In his column he targeted Sreesanth and wrote his bowling figures are far better than the quality of his bowling. As I read the column I understood that the right hand Australian batsmen are getting difficulty in playing Sreesath. In fact that was seen in earlier 20-20 match. Ponting understood that this single guy can make difference and so he started targeting him. They used to target Sachin earlier when they thought Sachin plays like a match winner but now as they know that Sachin is not in same touch they pointed out Sreesatnth. Sreesanth had bowled some inspiring spells in earlier test matches where India won against West Indies and England. Ponting felt this guy can make the difference so he and his company started targeting him to disturb his state of mind. In the same way like they do with Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff knowing that these guys can change the result of ashes series. Dhoni, Sreesanth and Indian cricket management would have understood this tactic much earlier and would have avoided all on and off the field talking tactics. Hope Sreesanth will be back in the same rhythm to bowl well spells in incoming test series in Australia. Else it will be a victory for Ponting and Co in the mind game.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Pune roads in this monsoon
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Power Of Youth
India is ICC 20-20 world champion. They played some really exciting cricket throughout the tournament. In bits and pieces each member of team contributed in this journey. The one thing noticeable is that team was young, captain was new. The famous trio of Sachin, Saurav, Dravid were not in team. Altogether that helped the team a lot. That helped them in dressing room. That helped the team in field. That helped the team in celebrating the victory with full expression with all media attention on them.
Let’s see how. This is almost the same team which traveled WI for WC 2007 in early this year minus three seasoned (mentally and physically tired, exhausted) cricketers plus few very new young players. But the result is totally different although the coach is missing, captain has zero match leading experience, Indian cricket fans were pessimistic and media had almost no attention. The absence of three famous senior players did the trick. In dressing room almost everyone was young (forget Agarkar he was a lost case in this championship at later part and that was a great decision) and new and was expressing his thoughts freely there was no shadow of heavyweights and their experienced thoughts. In field, the captain was feeling all the freedom to experiment and was able to direct the team as per his plan. In final match against Pakistan, Dhoni sent Yusuf Pathan to open the inning. Imagine if Sachin, Saurav would have been in team, they would have felt bad and forcibly tried to go to open the innings because they think *they* play better as openers (this story has been in news during WC 2007) and it doesn’t matter if team performs bad with that opening combination. Similarly in crunch situation like in last over of final match where Pakistan had to score 13 runs, the poor chap Joginder wouldn’t have got the chance to bowl because Sachin would have thought that he is a better bet in dead overs. Even media would have highlighted this point. Thus the purpose of having a captain would have been defeated every now and then. Imagine Saurav running breathless while going to stop a boundary and Sachin rubbing his knees in slips :) with Dravid chewing his nails. But in absence of these guys Uthappa got a chance to play and he fielded a ball played by Younis khan and broke the stumps of Imran Nazir to get a smart run out. The same guy jumped forward to hold a difficult catch at boundary line which he could not but at least he tried. Similarly Rohit Sharma demonstrated some smart piece of fielding in earlier match to get run outs. Limited over cricket is truly for young and energetic players who are looking for the dawn of their career than for them who should get retired instead of sticking (chipaku) with team like glued with FEVICOL by using their demigod image.
This victory was also a great comeback for player like Irfan Pathan. I feel we should also appreciate behind the scene contribution of last coach Greg Chappell who worked hard to create a pool of pace bowlers to strengthen the bench and thus we have pace bowlers like RP Singh, Sreesanth where even one of them clicks, India performs well. This victory also has an unsung hero in Gautam Gambhir who played well almost in every game but no one talked about him. This victory also indicates that perhaps Indian team knows to play better in absence of a coach. Dhoni took some decison which fortunately clicked but he needs to continue his approach to the game and the team. He has to prove his leadership quality in upcoming Australia series.
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Online Rail Ticket booking with IRCTC
Booking at IRCTC for festival season tickets is risky, unreliable and Herculean task.
At 7:55 AM I again started a fresh session at IRCTC and logged in. I prepared my query and got ready with all details. At 8 AM I pressed the OK button at IRCTC website and was shocked to see a blank page with "Service unavailable" message displayed. I kept trying many times. I tried with Internet Explorer, I tried with Mozilla firefox. Mostly it was not proceeding a single step after getting logged in to IRCTC website but Sometime I was able to proceed one or two step ahead and then it was displaying "Service unavailable" message or was hanging. I started getting frustrated. I was sure if I cannot book in next 15 minutes or so I cannot get a confirmed status railways reservation. I didn’t loose my heart and kept trying. Till 8:30, I might have logged in and logged out to IRCTC at least 100 times and somehow I could never proceed because of all the different kind of error displayed by IRCTC website. Looked like the server of IRCTC got unresponsive and got chocked due to heavy load at opening time. At 8:30 AM suddenly I could go one more step ahead and I saw status that the tickets are "NOT AVAILABLE". I lost the opportunity to book Rajdhani Express tickets on desired day. This is not the first time I had seen this happening.
All the services provided by Indian Railways are pathetic. Whether it’s catering, seating, security or even ticket booking. Indian Railways NOW claims they are in profit. They should utilize people's money to improve the services instead of going to all business schools to showcase there skills to convert a loss budget in profit budget and patting their own back.
Anyway I have changed my planned departure date and postponed my journey by one day and will be trying my luck at long quesues at Railway reservation counters at 5 or 6 AM tomorrow. Hopefully I will get a ticket.
I (and tens of thousands of railways passengers) usually remember these four lines and try thier luck every day with Indian Railways:
MAN MEIN HAI VISHWAS
PURA HAI VISHWAS
HUM HONGE KAMYAB EK DIN............. !
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
My Daughter's first day in school
I was five year old when I started attending school and I still remember even at that age I was feeling very bad and was feeling like going too far from my parents, family and home. Dhriti is not even three year old and so naturally she is not very mature to digest the concept of school (even for playgroup standard). At this age, putting pressure of a routine of attending school everyday is really not a good idea. But we need to do that to keep her upbringing on good track. When I was a kid, the social structure was not like of now. Families were mostly grouped on combined principles and were bigger in size so the initial learning of kids was very much possible within the family with highest quality and ensured safety. Now the things are very different. Concept of nucleus family has slowly arrived. The family grouping is mostly on tune of the western culture and usually size of families is very small. Now the family just constitutes Wife, Husband and kids. The families in the colony, society usually don’t interact much with each other. But the society is yet not fully transformed and the transition is still happening. In this transition period most suffered lot are the kids. Whole day at home they don’t see enough faces and persons to keep on playing and they get bored. They just interact with parents and don’t get a chance to interact with many people so the learning curve is also not very healthy. That’s the one of the primary reason people started sending little kids to schools at very tender age. The idea is to let them mingle with many kids there and also let them allow learning small things while being in school. The concept of playgroup, nursery and kindergarten in schools are well seen everywhere now and were not easily seen 25 years back in every school.
Monday, June 18, 2007
Bappi Da .... a legend?
Bappi Da it’s true that in 80s, there were only your songs getting hit in music industry and you did every A B and C for disco music but why do you forget that 80s is supposed to be worst music decade in Indian music and film industry. Please don’t compare yourself with greats like R D Burman.
Hope if someone can help Bappi Da to learn some modesty.
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Type of Unemployement
1. Complete unemployment
2. Half unemployment
3. Hidden unemployment
Complete unemployment is a situation where you don’t have any work to do thru out the day, week, month and year. It’s easy to understand. You wanted to do some work but there is no work for you. Next one is half unemployment. Half unemployment is, if you have some work available for you during some time of year and don’t have any work after that. Best example can be taken from some seasonal farming when a labor gets some employment while doing the paddy farming and sits unemployed after the season is over. This type of unemployment is also easy to understand. Third one is most difficult and confusing. Hidden unemployment is where from the outside, others think that everyone is employed but usually few of them have work to do. For example if n number of labors can do some work in time t but the m (where m>n) labors are employed to do same work in same time t then its hidden employment. Earlier the accurate and real world examples for this type of unemployment were the government departments where more than required number of engineer and helper were employed to do some work which can be completed with less number of worker. Socialist and communist philosophy encourages this type of unemployment. One more example is where a more skilled worker does less skilled work. For example, if a PhD holder is employed to do some work which can be easily done by a diploma holder.
Friday, May 25, 2007
Think positively Mr Prime Minister
1. The same village and slum people also do see the lavish and corrupt life style of our politicians, bureaucrats, thru media channels. Will that not affect the social balance?
2. In your career, altogether you yourselves accumulated a great wealth thru salaries (seems your bank balances goes up in crores as declared to Election Commission of India) by serving to Indian as well as International bodies. Didn’t you think in same way that time and voluntarily received a small salary which will be enough to run your family and expenses?
3. What is the source of income for Mrs. Sonia Gandhi? Will the life standard of Rahul Gandhi have any impact on the slum people? Or there is also a reservation rule applicable and slum people don’t get impacted when they see the lavish life style of you people and also come to know about your fat bank balances?
I had heard a story when I was a kid. There are two lines drawn on board and you need to make the size equal. A constructive approach is to extend the smaller line to the size of bigger line and another destructive approach is to delete some part of longer line to make that look similar to smaller line. Our respected Prime Minister has chosen the destructive path. He wants everyone in India to have a similar (poor) life standard so that everyone will be happy to see the hopeless standards of each other. Seems he has given up to the idea that we should improve the life standards of village and slum people. His comments and thoughts are disappointing and frustrating. May GOD give him some strength to think wisely and intellectually......
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Leader Follower paradigm
Usually leaders are few in numbers compared to followers and decide a path and follower (may be blindly) follows that path. This creates a famous tree kind of structure. Also a follower might have more than one leader (remember the multiple inheritance). Now the question is how the chain gets established? Means how a person who is of follower nature, decides which one person from the leaders community is actually his leader? I did some study, analysis and research in that and I believe its just a simple fact that if a person encounters another person which can do/perform or already performed few of the art which he/she couldn't or cannot, he/she accepts him/her as leader. For example, if a person is very much interested in playing soccer but could never became more than an average soccer player, meets a good above average soccer player in his team. He will surely get influenced and major chances are that he will accept him as his leader. If you will think in this line, you can easily validate several leader follower relationships around you with this concept.
So In case you are leading a team of individuals, first analyze every individual or group of individuals about their interests and passion and just try to demonstrate some good qualities in that fields in front of them which will ensure smooth formation of healthy leader-follower chain for you and your team. This is easy way to achieve "self evolved leadership" which is far better than "force imposed leadership" for a team.
At last, some followers are forcibly made leaders for a group of individual and software industry is good example of that :)
Friday, April 6, 2007
Well Played Greg....
Today I read in news paper that Sachin was not having good term with him because of his batting position. This again shows Sachin's selfishness and megalomaniac attitude. It is already proved fact that Chappell is a better strategist than Sachin (see Sachin's poor captaincy records) and as a coach had authority to decide the game plan but Sachin was reluctant to open the innings and when coach didnt agree, Sachin became his enemy. Sachin should always know he is not bigger than team. In past once he had expressed his displeasure when captain declared an inning and he was on 195. He was more interested in completing 200 than giving some extra time to Indian bowlers to bowled out the opposition. That shows his "commitments" towards the team. Hope with Chappell's resignation, senior non performing Indian players will learn the basics of commitment and responsibility and will follow the spirit to take back their names from team. One thing is sure that BCCI under politician Sharad Pawar wont do anything good for Indian team. So players need to take initiatives to clean up the system and image.
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Sorry DUDE, No one will listen to you
Lets assume everything was not great with Chappell in WC, but simple question is, why didn't you do your duty to score runs? Take example of our great individualistic player Saurav Dada Ganguly. He never had good terms with Chappell but he scored few runs against Bangladesh and Bermuda. If you would have scored a simple 30+ (individualistic) score against Bangladesh, India would not have been out of WC. Lets also assume you were too disturbed and not in good mental shape because of coach-player strained relations, then for the benefit of team, why didn't you took your name back from the team and allowed someone else to play on your place. If you would have done that, you would have shown great courage and people would have appreciated that. You didnt do these things. That clearly indicates that now you are not good for international cricket and also somehow you want to be part of the Indian team. I sincerely believe, for you its time to GO. Sorry to say but this is a fact and that fact is clearly coming out from all the record books. There are few so called "cricket experts" here in India who are denying the fact that cricket in Sachin is totally finished and trying to create a hypothetical picture of Sachin playing in next WC. These guys are playing with emotions of Indian cricket fans. Indian cricket fans need to be beware of such kind of useless vocal elements and keep focusing only on performances not the personalities before extending their support. The problem with Indian cricket fan is that they are like a devoted wife of cricket personalities. Whenever a personality dies, they behave like a typical hindi movie widow who doesnt accept that she is widow and keeps wearing bangles and vermilion and takes years to realise that her husband is dead and she is widow. Please wake up and say strongly GOOD BYE SACHIN with all due respect.
Friday, March 30, 2007
a man called Arjun Singh
I always believed that PM should assign him some serious work so that he will be busy. Looks like he has ample amount of time because there is a saying in hindi "Khali Dimag Shaitan ka Ghar".
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Let's not boycott them..
As soon as India was out of WC, print and electronic media started doing "detailed" analysis. These news channels are now behind everyone related with Indian cricket team. They are the guys who first made the players feel like crowned king by reporting every single movements and activities done by any player. I remember once in prime time news hour, one of the news channels happily reported that there are some gossips going around for Dhoni's marriage. They reached Dhoni's house with camera and microphone to interview his parents to get every small details about Dhoni's marriage. Now Dhoni is villain for all of the news channels. Similarly for Greg. When he took over coaching job, they called him Guru Greg and started reporting each steps taken by Greg as something innovative. Now the poor chap is target of almost everyone including Kapil Dev who once coached India to australia tour (in 1999) and secured 3-0 white wash for India team in tests and 4-1 humiliating defeat in One Dayers. Yesterday I read a column http://in.rediff.com/wc2007/2007/mar/26guest.htm on rediff.com and somewhat I do agree with the author. People like Kapil Dev, Sunil Gavaskar never did anything right for Indian cricket after retirement. They just kept on cribbing on everything from management to players to performances. I do remember Kapil's "splendid" performances for almost 6 years during 1988-1993. I do agree everyone in Indian team performed really very bad in WC and this is a fact. No one can escape. Not even Saurav, because everyone knows that he was the person who was in form. He scored few runs in group matches but this is also true that he slowed down the pace of scoring rate and set the rythm for team to score with an average of 4 runs per over. We can say same things for Zaheer, Munaf. They performed reasonably well but their performances were never threatning to opposition. In cricket even a single bowler can change the direction of match. For team like Bangladesh, score of 192 was defendable, if fast bowlers had taken 4-5 wickets in first 20 overs or so. Thus not only batsmen but bowlers too failed. So what should we do to show our anger to Indian Cricket Team. Should we pelt stones on them? Should we raise some slogans on streets? No. Not at all. We should not boycott them but we should boycott the products they endorse. Like if someone from Indian cricket team endorses one soft drink, we should start using another brand. Anyway there is not much difference in taste of different soft drinks. Similarly for all other products. Let’s boycott all the products endorsed by any one of Indian cricket team. Let’s boycott all the fashion shows (even on TVs) where they walk on ramp. Let’s boycott all the movies where they go for muhurat and all. I thought that will be the best way to express our anger. I was shocked to hear on a TV news channel that representatives of these companies influence the selectors to select the player who endorses their products. So we need to boycott the products than the players. Don’t boycott Indian cricket. Don’t boycott Indian cricket team. Boycott the products they endorse.......
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Positive Imaging
I always thought these concepts useless in this modern scientific days but seems I need to think about these things a bit seriously. These kind of theories are difficult tobe proved or denied scientifically. I can write lot more about this.... mainly in our culture but this blog will get stretched to appear a boring blog :)
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
controversy related to Woolmer's death
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
India in WC 2007
After India lost first match against Bangladesh, there were lots of discussions and columns in media. My opinion was bit different for the blames the experts of cricket were putting on individuals. I always felt that the over cautious and slow batting of sachin and Ganguly for 3rd wicket took away the match from India. They were not rotating strike and so the confidence of bangladesh bowlers and fielders were getting boosted ball by ball. See the stat. Sachin played 26 balls for his 7 runs and that also with a boundary. That means he socred only 3 runs in ones and twos in 25 balls.